Given a 2 terabyte drive space requirement for a production file server, which disk type is most cost-effective?

Given a 2 terabyte drive space requirement for a production file server, which disk type is most cost-effective?

• A. SSD
• B. Tape
• C. HDD
• D. VLAN

Answer: (C)

The key idea is cost per capacity for storage types. For a production file server that needs about 2 terabytes, hard disk drives provide the lowest cost per gigabyte among common options, so they deliver the most storage for the money. They offer ample performance for typical file-serving workloads at a fraction of the cost of solid-state drives. Solid-state drives, while faster, are much more expensive per gigabyte, which isn’t ideal when you’re prioritizing capacity and cost. Tape is inexpensive per gigabyte but is designed for archival, offline storage, and isn’t suitable for active file access required by a production server. VLAN is a networking concept, not a storage medium, so it doesn’t address storage capacity at all. So, for 2 TB, HDD is the most cost-effective choice.

The key idea is cost per capacity for storage types. For a production file server that needs about 2 terabytes, hard disk drives provide the lowest cost per gigabyte among common options, so they deliver the most storage for the money. They offer ample performance for typical file-serving workloads at a fraction of the cost of solid-state drives. Solid-state drives, while faster, are much more expensive per gigabyte, which isn’t ideal when you’re prioritizing capacity and cost. Tape is inexpensive per gigabyte but is designed for archival, offline storage, and isn’t suitable for active file access required by a production server. VLAN is a networking concept, not a storage medium, so it doesn’t address storage capacity at all. So, for 2 TB, HDD is the most cost-effective choice.